Inferno- fueled pursuit of Trump through the library using a flamethrower
Harvard in Crosshairs as Trump Administration Pursues Control over Prestigious University
America's top educational institution, Harvard University, finds itself in the center of a high-stakes confrontation with the Trump administration. The administration's objectives extend beyond political disagreements with the university's faculty and students, as it works to exert its influence over the prestigious private university.
The battle for academic freedom and independence has reached new heights, as the Trump government takes aim at Harvard, the country's oldest and most esteemed university. The White House is attacking the institution from multiple angles, targeting various sources of its funding. Harvard is fighting back, engaging in a confrontation that mirrors the broader struggle for educational autonomy and scholarly independence.
Harvard's annual budget stands at $6.5 billion, with approximately 11% of that amount coming from federal research funds that the government plans to eliminate entirely. International student tuition fees are also at risk. The proposed measures could reduce the university's total income by roughly 20%. Harvard accuses the White House of a vindictive campaign and insists upon its right to independently determine its curriculum, operations, and campus. However, the reasons behind this campaign remain unclear.
Last week, Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem threatened to ban international students from Harvard and demanded their data, setting a short deadline. In response, Harvard filed a lawsuit the following day, and a court blocked the government's action, citing potential "sudden and irreparable harm" to the university. Despite the court's ruling, the Trump administration continued its assault, now focusing on student visas. Worldwide, US embassies have stopped scheduling interviews for student visa applications, and they plan to scrutinize applicants' social media profiles, particularly those of Chinese students, more closely, potentially denying or revoking their visas.
New Guidelines coming; Rubio Halts Visa Issuance for Foreign Students
In April, the White House accused Harvard of tolerance for anti-Semitic activities and made far-reaching demands, including requiring the university to hand over data on international students and their protest activities over the past five years. Harvard complied, but the government deemed the provided data inadequate and escalated by threatening to ban international students, who make up 27% of the university's student body.
A Wide-Reaching Assault on Academic Freedom
The demands from Washington, however, are not limited to this. A commission established by the White House seeks to place Harvard under supervision "at least until the end of 2028," as stated in their April letter. During this period, the university must share all planned changes with the government, which will "comprehensively review" their implementation.
Harvard is expected to abolish all equal opportunities programs and align its student admissions and faculty hiring practices accordingly. It must not admit international students deemed "enemies of American values and institutions" and must immediately report any misconduct. By the end of the year, Harvard must assess "diversity of thought" across its operations and, if lacking, hire faculty and admit students in "critical mass" in all departments. Harvard is also expected to allow students to anonymously report the university's violations to the government.
Threatening to Revoke Harvard's Tax-Exempt Status for Educational Institutions
Education Minister Linda McMahon has frozen federal funds, accusing Harvard of concealing donations from foreign donors and governments. Harvard claims to have disclosed everything. Accusations against Harvard range from antisemitism and terrorism to lack of free speech and civil rights violations. There is no elaboration upon these accusations in the letters, but they can be inferred from other statements.
The Politics of Resistance: "Universities were already Trumpified before Trump"
One of the Trump administration's accusations claims that whites are being discriminated against. By invoking the accusation of antisemitism, they are inverting the history of racism in the U.S., presenting their predominantly white voter base as the victims. Universities are purportedly discriminating against whites under the guise of equal opportunities law, the Civil Rights Act of 1964, although it was primarily enacted to combat racism by whites against blacks. For decades, students and faculty were selected and hired based on quotas for the "race" category.
However, two years ago, the conservative-dominated Supreme Court banned the practice for admissions. The majority of newly enrolled students at Harvard were still white after the ruling. In the case of professors and other teaching positions, whites are reportedly systematically pushed to the bottom of the applicant pile. It remains disputed whether this is covered by law. Among the faculty at the university, whites comprise an overwhelming majority of around 75%.
The Trump administration is also targeting ideological differences, arguing that the academic establishment is too left, insufficiently conservative, and too anti-MAGA. In reality, Harvard only represents a narrow spectrum of political views in America, with a small percentage of students identifying as conservative. According to a survey conducted by the campus newspaper "Harvard Crimson," it stood at 13% last year. Even fewer students identified as Trump supporters. Conservatives are also in the minority among faculty at other Ivy League universities.
Harvard is not the only target of the Trump administration. It is accusing over 60 universities across the country of antisemitism and has threatened investigations and the withdrawal of research funding. In 2023, these institutions received a combined total of approximately $23 billion in public funds, representing more than a third of the total funds distributed to universities nationwide. The White House aims to set an example against the unwanted left-leaning trend at universities.
"It's About Power"
US Vice President JD Vance, a Yale graduate, described the faculty at his alma mater as "totalitarian" in 2021. He claimed that conservatives had no place there and alleged that the dominant leftists were an oligarchy, silencing Americans who protested. Sending children to universities where they are allegedly brainwashed and burdened with debt to achieve a middle-class life is absurd, he asserted. "It's about power," explained Vance. The White House is now questioning this power with full force in its own logic.
The extent to which efforts to amplify conservative voices can go remains uncertain. The potential measures raise questions about how the Trump commission envisions its changes in practice. Would there be political or ideological screening of potential students, teachers, and professors? What guidelines will ensure this? How will curricula be controlled in terms of content, and what will happen if changes are imposed from above? What will constitute sufficient evidence for complaints submitted through the denouncement hotline? Will Homeland Security intervene to enforce their vision? Will ICE, the agency responsible for deporting students, be involved?
No matter how one interprets this, the possible actions smack of an authoritarian state rather than the open discussions advocated by the White House. The demand itself is justified, as Harvard is not an environment that fosters open discussions, according to an independent, nationwide survey on freedom of speech at 257 universities. Harvard has consistently ranked last for the past two years and received the rating "miserable" alongside four others. However, Trump appears intent on burning through Harvard's libraries with a flamethrower to purge ideological tendencies among students and faculty.
The extent to which the administration's actions will reshape higher education remains unclear. The Navy's recent removal of around 400 books from its library due to not aligning with Trump's decrees on diversity, equity, and inclusion measures provides a glimpse into this. Many anti-racist works, or simply those dealing with "non-white, cisgender heterosexual men," were among those removed. "Mein Kampf" remains available.
The structure and training of the military are different, but civilian education at universities plays a crucial role in shaping future leaders. It may be challenging for researchers and students to identify with the positions of the Republicans, and especially the MAGA wing. Disregarding or mocking science as a basis for informed decision-making in public discussions will not change this. The administration's denial of climate change and its repercussions exemplifies this approach.
A Cultural War at the Top
The power struggle over Harvard holds the greatest symbolic value. Trump's government wishes to use the university in Massachusetts to embody its ideal vision for the nation: Education and research should be subordinate to the president's politics, regardless of how autocratic he may exercise his office. Many conservatives view universities as breeding grounds for progressives who hinder their goals and should therefore be kept in check. In the end, the future leaders of America are molded at elite universities.
Trump's social culture war—originally focused on gender, "woke" books, and school curricula—has now reached the summit. What began as a conflict over antisemitism allegations has evolved into a battle for elite universities. Vance, at a right-wing conference four years ago, had declared, "Universities must be aggressively attacked." He believed that universities do not nurture critical thinking, but control societal knowledge, thereby determining what is considered truth or falsehood. And what could be more threatening to a government that spins its own truth?
- The Commission, established by the White House, has been tasked with formulating a proposal for a directive on the protection of workers in the education-and-self-development sector from risks related to exposure to ionizing radiation, as a part of their broader action against Harvard University and other universities across the country.
- In light of the ongoing political conflict with the Trump administration, Harvard University has emphasized the importance of online-education platforms as a crucial tool for continuing their academic programs, irrespective of the potential barriers posed by policy-and-legislation changes.
- As the confrontation between the Trump administration and Harvard University intensifies, intellectuals and advocates for policy-and-legislation reform relating to war-and-conflicts and general-news are turning their attention to the crisis, aiming to ensure that academic freedom and learning continue to be upheld within the American educational system.
- In the midst of these turbulent times, many are looking towards policy-and-legislation changes to protect higher education institutions from overreaching government interference, as a means of preserving the diverse ideas and knowledge that enable self-development and progress in a rapidly changing world.
